|
CIRC PRESS RELEASE - November 2009 |
Voluntary corporate
compliance and capacity building are key to build a better
competition regime in India: Salman Khurshid
New Delhi, 25-26 November, 2009
“As the enforcement
of the Indian Competition Act has begun in full swing, voluntary
corporate compliance and capacity building of the stakeholders
are critical steps to build and develop a better competition
culture in India,” said Salman Khurshid, the Indian Minister for
Corporate Affairs. He was speaking at a recently concluded
International Conference on the Interface between Competition
Policy & Law and Business Strategy organised by the CUTS
Institute for Regulation & Competition (CIRC) in association
with CUTS International and NERA Economic Consulting as
knowledge partners. On this occasion he released a Toolkit on
the Competition Law in India, which was prepared and published
by CUTS International and CIRC. More than 50 participants from
among the competition authority, legal community, corporate
houses and academia attended the event.
While delivering a
Special Address, Dhanendra Kumar, Chairman, Competition
Commission of India said that the Commission has started
investigations into the initial cases. He further said that
there is a huge deficit in terms of skills not only at the
Commission but also in companies which need to remain compliant
to the competition law. In order to overcome such constraints,
he suggested that in addition to organising focused and targeted
programmes, competition law should be integrated into various
academic streams.
Mukesh Kacker,
Director General of CIRC announced the launch of a part-time
certificate course on “competition law and business strategy”
which CIRC has conceived to cater to the needs of practicing
lawyers, economists and business executives. The need for
formulating and implementing a national competition policy was
discussed at length by Pradeep Mehta, Secretary General of CUTS
International. Such a policy is needed to address the
competition issues across sectors and also those relating to
states.
Intense discussion
on substantive issues such as abuse of dominance,
anti-competitive agreements, cartels took place in this two-day
event held in Delhi. Sharing his experience from Mexico, Eduardo
Perez Motta, Chairman of the Mexican competition authority
explained why there is less competition in non-tradable sectors
and how it affects the people at large. Allan Fels, Former
Chairman of the Australian competition authority discussed his
experience with dealing with anti-competitive practices in
professional services particularly medical services.
Stressing the
timeliness in decision making, noted economist S. L. Rao said
that all regulators need to be sensitive about time they take in
doing their jobs. On the issues of regulatory domain of a
sectoral regulator, the recent case of whether or not Petroleum
and Natural Gas Regulatory Board can accept a complaint on a
competition matter L. Mansingh, Chairperson, PNGRB said that it
is possible and should be done in consultation with the
Competition Commission. He stressed on the need for injecting
competition across distribution channels of petroleum and
natural gas products.
Speaking on European
experiences of using economics for competition law decision
making, Yannis Katsoulacos of Athens University said that
European Commission has shed its initial hesitation and has
started using modern modelling tools in investigations. He
specifically pointed out that while dominance is a legal concept
market power is an economic concept. David Mathew, an expert
from NERA Economic Consulting highlighted how wrong use of
criteria in determining relevant markets can lead to flawed
outcomes of an investigation.
Shubhashis
Gangopadhyay discussed two European cases to indicate that these
days use of sophisticated and indirect manners is prevalent in
cartels. Such a trend poses serious challenges before the Indian
competition authority to detect and investigate such collusive
behaviour. On the issue of interface between competition
authority and sectoral regulators, he said that it should not be
viewed as adversarial. Noted economist T. C. A. Anant dealt on
the use of ex-ante and ex-post analysis in competition law and
sectoral regulation. In the context of developing countries and
their fast changing economic realities, he said that past can
not be a guide to the future. Nitin Desai, former Chief Economic
Advisor to the Government of India, in his closing remarks, said
that the time has come to combine economics and law while making
policies; however, in doing that India is to travel a long road.
He underlined that CIRC is envisioned to fill this gap.
For further
details, please contact:
Navneet Sharma, +91 92127 23123,
ns@circ.in
<<Back |